Kwon Oh-eul Faces Criticism for Failing to Return 270 Million KRW in Election Subsidy After Law Violation

Who is Kwon Oh-eul? The Man at the Center of the Controversy

Did you know that Kwon Oh-eul, a seasoned politician and nominee for Korea’s Minister of Patriots and Veterans Affairs, is now at the heart of a national controversy? After running for Gyeongbuk Governor in 2018 under the Bareunmirae Party and losing, Kwon’s political career seemed to quiet down—until recent revelations about his unresolved election subsidy debts reignited public scrutiny.

The Election Law Violation: What Happened?

Let’s break it down. In the 2018 local elections, Kwon Oh-eul was found guilty of violating the Public Official Election Act. He paid campaigners who were not officially registered, which is strictly forbidden. The Supreme Court confirmed his sentence in April 2021: 10 months in prison, suspended for two years. According to Korean law, any candidate found guilty under these circumstances must return all election subsidies received within 30 days of the ruling.

The 270 Million KRW Subsidy: Why Hasn’t It Been Returned?

Here’s where things get heated. Kwon was ordered by the Gyeongbuk Election Commission in May 2021 to return approximately 274 million KRW in election subsidies. However, as of June 2025, he has not paid back a single won. Instead, he reported the entire amount as a debt on his official financial disclosure. This has led to accusations of ‘taxpayer theft’ and calls for his immediate resignation.

Political and Community Reactions: Outrage and Demands for Accountability

Korean online communities like DCInside, FM Korea, and PGR21 are buzzing with criticism. Many users are outraged, calling Kwon’s actions a betrayal of public trust. On TheQoo, some comments read, ‘How can someone who ignores the law be a minister?’ and ‘Is this what our taxes are for?’ Others on Naver and Natepan express disbelief at the lack of enforcement, with one top comment stating, ‘If this was an ordinary person, would they get away with it?’ There are a few defenders, but the overwhelming sentiment is negative.

The Political Fallout: Calls for Resignation and Further Investigation

National Assembly member Lee Yang-soo has been especially vocal, demanding that Kwon not only return the funds but also step down from his ministerial candidacy. The issue has become a major talking point in the ongoing vetting process for government officials, with opposition parties using it to criticize the administration’s standards for public office.

Kwon Oh-eul’s Response: Special Pardon and Promises of Transparency

Kwon claims he was granted a special pardon during the August 15 Liberation Day amnesty in 2024, but critics argue that this does not absolve him of the legal obligation to return the funds. Kwon has stated he will explain everything during his confirmation hearing and has hinted at seeking a retrial. However, these explanations have not satisfied the public or political opponents.

Broader Cultural Context: Why Election Subsidies Matter in Korea

For international readers, it’s important to understand that election subsidies in Korea are taxpayer-funded and intended to ensure fair competition. When these funds are misused or not returned after legal violations, it strikes a nerve with the public, who see it as a direct misuse of their money. This is why the Kwon Oh-eul case has become such a flashpoint.

Media and Blog Coverage: What Are People Saying?

Recent news articles from Chosun Ilbo, Hankyoreh, News1, Yonhap, and Donga have all covered the story, highlighting both the legal and ethical issues. Naver and Tistory blogs are filled with posts dissecting the timeline, legal arguments, and Kwon’s political history. Bloggers often compare this case to previous political scandals, emphasizing the need for stronger accountability.

Online Community Insights: The Voice of the People

Browsing through DCInside and Instiz, you’ll find a mix of sarcasm and genuine anger. Some users post memes about ‘political privilege,’ while others share detailed breakdowns of the law and call for reform. On FM Korea, a popular comment reads, ‘If politicians don’t follow the law, why should anyone else?’ This sentiment is echoed across platforms, showing a rare unity among netizens.

What’s Next? The Ongoing Confirmation Hearing and Public Pressure

As of July 2025, Kwon Oh-eul’s confirmation hearing is underway. Lawmakers are pressing for clear answers, and the media continues to investigate. The outcome could set a precedent for how Korea handles similar cases in the future. Will Kwon finally return the funds and restore public trust? Or will this scandal deepen skepticism about political accountability in Korea?

Why International Fans Should Care: Lessons from Korea’s Political Culture

For those interested in Korean politics and society, this case is a window into how deeply issues of transparency and accountability matter to the public. It also shows the power of online communities in shaping political discourse and holding leaders to account. Whether you’re a K-drama fan or a student of international relations, the Kwon Oh-eul controversy offers a real-world lesson in civic engagement and the challenges of political reform.