BJ Sentenced to 7 Years for Extorting 840 Million KRW from Kim Junsu: The Full Story Behind the Shocking Blackmail Case

The Scandal That Shocked K-pop: What Happened to Kim Junsu?
Did you know that one of Korea’s most beloved singers, Kim Junsu, was the victim of a multi-year blackmail scheme? From 2020 to 2023, a female BJ (broadcast jockey) systematically extorted nearly 840 million KRW (about $600,000) from him. The shocking details of the case have taken over headlines, with fans and the general public alike reeling from the revelations. The BJ, who was active on AfreecaTV, secretly recorded private conversations with Junsu and threatened to leak them on social media unless he paid up. This wasn’t a one-off: she blackmailed him 101 times, making this one of the most persistent celebrity extortion cases in recent memory.
How the Blackmail Unfolded: From Friendship to Threats

The story began innocently enough in 2019, when Kim Junsu met the BJ, initially believing she was a nail artist. Over time, their acquaintance grew, but the BJ began secretly recording their private conversations and even took personal photos. Starting in September 2020, she began threatening Junsu, saying she would release these recordings and images online, which could irreparably damage his reputation as a public figure. The threats were relentless, with the BJ demanding money and valuables again and again. According to court documents and police investigations, her primary motive was to fund her drug purchases, adding another disturbing layer to the case.
Legal Battles and the Final Verdict: Seven Years Behind Bars
When Kim Junsu could no longer tolerate the harassment, he filed a police complaint. Investigations revealed the full extent of the BJ’s actions: 101 instances of blackmail, totaling 8.4 billion KRW. The courts did not take the crime lightly. In the first trial, the judge emphasized the calculated and repeated nature of the blackmail, the significant financial and emotional harm to Junsu, and the need for a strong deterrent. The BJ was sentenced to seven years in prison, a sentence upheld by the appellate court, which also ordered the confiscation of her phones to prevent further harm. The Supreme Court recently finalized the verdict, dismissing the BJ’s appeal and confirming the seven-year sentence.
Community and Fan Reactions: Sympathy, Outrage, and Lessons Learned
The case has ignited heated discussions across Korean online communities such as Theqoo, Nate Pann, Instiz, Naver, Daum, DC Inside, FM Korea, and PGR21. Many fans expressed deep sympathy for Kim Junsu, praising his courage for coming forward and seeking justice. Comments like 'No one deserves to be blackmailed for their private life' and 'Celebrities are humans too, they deserve protection' were common. Others expressed outrage at the BJ’s actions, especially given her use of the extorted money for drugs. However, some netizens also questioned how such a large sum could be paid over years, reflecting the complex emotions and curiosity the case provoked.
The Dark Side of Streaming Culture: Why This Case Resonates
For international fans, it’s important to understand the unique pressures faced by Korean celebrities. The rise of BJs and internet streamers on platforms like AfreecaTV has created new opportunities—but also new risks. Streamers often blur the line between personal and public life, and the intense competition for attention can lead to extreme behavior. In this case, the BJ exploited both her access to a celebrity and the viral power of social media. The incident has sparked debates in Korea about privacy, digital ethics, and the responsibility of platforms to protect both creators and the public from criminal acts.
Kim Junsu’s Response and the Road Ahead
Throughout the ordeal, Kim Junsu and his agency, Palm Tree Island, maintained that he was an unequivocal victim. They released official statements emphasizing that Junsu had committed no wrongdoing and that legal action was necessary to prevent further harm—not just to him, but to other potential victims. Junsu himself reassured fans, saying he had nothing to hide and was determined to protect his reputation. The case has also highlighted the need for stronger legal protections for public figures and a broader societal conversation about privacy, mental health, and the impact of fame in the digital age.
Cultural Insights: Why This Case Matters to K-pop and Korean Society
This case is more than just a celebrity scandal; it’s a reflection of deeper issues in Korean society. The vulnerability of stars, the power of social media, and the risks of unchecked digital platforms are all in the spotlight. For K-pop fans worldwide, it’s a reminder that behind the glamour, idols face real dangers. The strong reaction from the Korean public and the decisive legal response show a growing awareness of these challenges. As the dust settles, many hope this case will lead to better safeguards for both celebrities and ordinary people in an increasingly connected world.
Discover More

Power Struggle in Busan: Ruling Party Slams Democrats Over Prime Minister Nominee Hearing
The People Power Party's Busan branch fiercely criticized the Democratic Party for labeling legitimate scrutiny of Prime Minister nominee Kim Min-seok as malicious attacks, sparking a heated political and cultural debate in South Korea.

Jeong Dong-young’s Bold Vision: A New Era for Inter-Korean Relations and Unification Policy Reform
Jeong Dong-young, South Korea’s Unification Minister nominee, calls for a new approach to North-South relations, advocating for dialogue, peace, and even a possible renaming of the Ministry of Unification, drawing lessons from Germany’s reunification era.