South Korea: The Historic Ruling that Returns Prime Minister Han Duck-soo
Why Was His Removal Requested?
The impeachment was based on five key accusations: 1. Collaboration in the 2023-2024 martial law 2. Blocking judicial appointments 3. Omission in the rebellion investigation 4. Questionable use of presidential veto 5. Co-governance with the ruling party
The Verdict: What Did the Constitutional Court Say?
The majority of judges considered that there was no "serious betrayal of public trust" under his decision. Discrepancies in the omission before unconstitutional acts. Validation of the quorum for removal.
Political Reactions: Triumph or Defeat for Democracy?
Partisan reactions and independent analysts warn about dangerous precedents. The hashtag #HanDuck-soo_NotInnocent went viral on social networks.
Korean Citizens: Between Skepticism and Indifference
Survey reveals 58% disapproval. Citizen opinions reflect indifference to political crises compared to economic issues.
| Implications for Yoon Suk-yeol | Political earthquake. Perceived double standard if Yoon is acquitted. Impact on the composition of the Constitutional Court. |
|---|
What's Next for South Korea?
Three challenges: Judicial reform, April 2025 parliamentary elections, and the legacy of martial law. Economic priority under Han's questioned leadership.
Conclusion: A Chapter that Redefines Korean Democracy
A reflection of tensions between legality and political pragmatism. 2025 as a decisive year for democratic values.