Democratic Party Forces Committee Chair Elections Despite Opposition Boycott - Political Standoff Rocks Korean National Assembly

Political Standoff Erupts in Korean National Assembly
The Korean National Assembly witnessed a dramatic political confrontation on June 27, 2025, as the ruling Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) proceeded with the unilateral election of four key committee chairs despite fierce opposition from the People Power Party (PPP). This unprecedented move has sent shockwaves through South Korea's political landscape, highlighting the deepening partisan divide that continues to paralyze legislative proceedings.
The controversy centers around the appointment of chairs for four crucial committees: the Legislative and Judiciary Committee, the Budget and Settlement Special Committee, the Culture, Sports and Tourism Committee, and the National Assembly Steering Committee. These positions are considered vital for the functioning of the legislature, as they oversee key policy areas and legislative processes that directly impact citizens' daily lives.
What makes this situation particularly contentious is the Democratic Party's decision to forge ahead with the appointments without securing bipartisan consensus, breaking with traditional parliamentary norms that emphasize cooperation between ruling and opposition parties. The move has been characterized by opposition lawmakers as an authoritarian power grab that undermines democratic principles and parliamentary tradition.
The Key Players in the Political Drama

The Democratic Party has appointed four seasoned legislators to lead these critical committees, each bringing significant parliamentary experience to their new roles. Lee Chun-seok, a four-term lawmaker representing Jeonbuk Iksan-si Gap, has been selected as the chair of the Legislative and Judiciary Committee. Lee's background as a former lawyer and adjunct professor at Wonkwang University Law School, combined with his extensive parliamentary experience since the 18th National Assembly, makes him a formidable choice for this influential position.
Han Byeong-do, a three-term representative from Jeonbuk Iksan-si Eul, will helm the Budget and Settlement Special Committee, a role that puts him at the center of South Korea's fiscal policy debates. Kim Kyo-hung, also serving his third term and representing Incheon Seo-gu Gap, takes charge of the Culture, Sports and Tourism Committee. Perhaps most significantly, Kim Byung-ki, the party's current floor leader and acting representative, will assume the National Assembly Steering Committee chairmanship, a position that traditionally goes to the ruling party's parliamentary leader.
These appointments reflect the Democratic Party's strategy of placing experienced legislators in key positions, with all four appointees having served multiple terms and accumulated significant expertise in their respective policy areas. The party's decision to move forward with these appointments demonstrates their determination to maintain control over the legislative agenda despite opposition resistance.
Opposition's Fierce Resistance and Boycott Strategy
The People Power Party's response to the Democratic Party's unilateral move has been swift and uncompromising. Led by floor leader Song Eon-seok, the opposition party staged a dramatic walkout from the National Assembly plenary session, refusing to participate in what they characterized as an illegitimate power grab. This boycott strategy represents one of the most significant acts of parliamentary resistance in recent Korean political history.
Song Eon-seok's criticism was particularly scathing, targeting what he perceived as the Democratic Party's hypocrisy regarding cooperation and dialogue. He pointedly referenced statements made by Lee Jae-myung exactly one month prior, where the then-candidate emphasized that politics is fundamentally about communication, respect, recognition, and compromise. Song argued that the Democratic Party's actions completely contradicted these principles, describing their promises of cooperation as 'complete lies.'
The opposition's strategy extended beyond mere parliamentary boycott to include a public demonstration of their displeasure. While the ruling party conducted the committee chair elections inside the main assembly hall, People Power Party lawmakers gathered in the National Assembly's Rotunda Hall to hold a protest rally, denouncing what they termed the 'forced processing' of committee chair appointments. This dual-track approach of parliamentary non-cooperation combined with public protest represents a significant escalation in the political confrontation.
National Assembly Speaker's Difficult Position
National Assembly Speaker Woo Won-shik found himself in an extremely challenging position, caught between the competing demands of the ruling and opposition parties. The Speaker's role in this crisis has been particularly scrutinized, as his decisions ultimately enabled the Democratic Party's unilateral action while disappointing opposition hopes for a more balanced approach.
Prior to the controversial session, Speaker Woo met with opposition leaders who requested a one-week postponement of the committee chair elections to allow for further negotiations. However, Woo ultimately decided that further delays would be counterproductive, stating that sufficient time had already been provided for negotiations and that the likelihood of successful talks appeared minimal. His decision to proceed with the session effectively gave the green light to the Democratic Party's plans.
In justifying his decision, Speaker Woo emphasized the practical necessity of filling the vacant committee chair positions, arguing that leaving these crucial roles unfilled would severely hamper the National Assembly's ability to process urgent legislation related to people's livelihoods and economic issues. He expressed regret about the situation but maintained that his intervention was necessary to prevent further legislative paralysis. This pragmatic approach, while understandable from an institutional perspective, has drawn criticism from opposition parties who view it as partisan favoritism disguised as procedural necessity.
Historical Context and Parliamentary Traditions
The current crisis must be understood within the broader context of Korean parliamentary traditions and the ongoing struggle between ruling and opposition parties over institutional power. Historically, the distribution of committee chairs has been a subject of negotiation between parties, with certain positions traditionally allocated to the opposition to ensure checks and balances within the legislative system.
The People Power Party's particular insistence on controlling the Legislative and Judiciary Committee and Budget and Settlement Committee chairs reflects longstanding parliamentary conventions designed to prevent any single party from monopolizing oversight functions. These committees play crucial roles in scrutinizing government actions and managing public finances, making opposition control a vital component of democratic governance.
The Democratic Party's argument that the distribution of committee chairs was already settled during negotiations over the formation of the first-term floor leadership last year represents a different interpretation of parliamentary procedure. This disagreement over the timing and permanence of such arrangements highlights the absence of clear, universally accepted rules governing these critical institutional decisions. The current standoff reveals fundamental weaknesses in South Korea's parliamentary system that allow for such dramatic confrontations over basic procedural matters.
Implications for Korean Democracy and Governance
The unilateral election of committee chairs represents more than just a procedural dispute; it reflects deeper challenges facing Korean democracy and the country's ability to maintain effective governance in an era of intense political polarization. The breakdown of bipartisan cooperation threatens to undermine the National Assembly's capacity to address pressing national issues, from economic recovery to social welfare reform.
Public reaction to this political drama has been mixed, with many citizens expressing frustration over what they perceive as politicians prioritizing partisan interests over national governance. The spectacle of opposition lawmakers staging protests while crucial legislative business remains stalled reinforces negative perceptions of political dysfunction that have plagued Korean politics for years.
Looking ahead, this confrontation sets a concerning precedent for future parliamentary operations. If the majority party can unilaterally control all key committee positions without meaningful opposition input, it fundamentally alters the balance of power within the National Assembly and potentially weakens democratic oversight mechanisms. The long-term consequences of this power grab may extend far beyond the immediate political crisis, potentially reshaping how Korean democracy functions at its most fundamental level.
The international community will also be watching closely, as South Korea's democratic institutions face this significant test. The country's reputation as a stable democracy in East Asia could be affected by how effectively it resolves this institutional crisis and whether it can restore meaningful bipartisan cooperation in its national legislature.
Discover More

Shocking Case: 54-Year-Old Son Gets 3 Years for Repeatedly Assaulting Elderly Parents After Prison Release
A 54-year-old man who habitually assaulted his elderly parents received a 3-year prison sentence after attacking them again just one year after his release from previous convictions.

Korea Launches Massive AI Talent Hunt: 400 Postdocs with $66K Salaries to Combat Brain Drain
South Korea announces ambitious InnoCORE program recruiting 400 international postdoctoral researchers in AI convergence fields with competitive salaries and world-class research facilities to prevent talent exodus.